Under Jerome Powell’s leadership, the Federal Reserve long operated on a shared-policy outlook: board members largely agreed on economic risks and how to respond. That period of alignment appears to be over. Officials now face diverging views on inflation, employment and how quickly to loosen monetary policy.
From gold-standard-style cohesion to fractured policy planning
During previous years, the Fed’s decisions were underpinned by a relatively unified approach. But today’s economy poses two major conflicting pressures: a softening labor market and inflation that’s stuck higher than the 2 % target. With these forces pulling in different directions, consensus has broken down.
Inflation is proving more stubborn than expected, while job creation has decelerated. This creates a tough judgment call: should the Fed lean into easing to protect employment, or maintain higher rates to stamp out inflation? The range of views on the board reflects that dilemma.
What this shift means for markets and policy
The absence of consensus means three things for investors and watchers:
-
Greater volatility ahead. When a central bank lacks internal alignment, markets often struggle to anticipate policy-moves clearly.
-
Data-dependence is back. With fewer fixed assumptions, each incoming economic release could sway decisions more than before.
-
Risk of policy errors rises. When half the board worries about inflation and the other half worries about jobs, hitting the right balance becomes harder.
In short, Powell’s era of smooth, predictable decision-making at the Fed has given way to one characterized by internal debate, higher uncertainty and a greater premium on incoming data. Those who invest or trade based on Fed moves need to adjust accordingly.